Children’s Books – The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. But Mostly The Ugly.

Reading_BugMy wife, thankfully, is a voracious reader. I say, “thankfully”, because someone has to vet all the literature our children read; and they read a lot. The thing is, there’s a lot of ugly stuff out there, and it’s produced by a secular entertainment industry which cares nothing for the well-being of children. All they care about is pushing the envelope in order to tantalize young minds. In the end, it’s all about appealing to the basest of human nature in order to sell a product whilst promoting a worldview untethered from moral restraints. What’s worse is that the entertainment industry is propped up by secular critics who, quite frankly, are shills for their material (whether for ideological or for pecuniary reasons).

Not all critics, however, are quick to embrace the trend toward dark children’s literature. Meghan Cox Gurdon has made the case more than once for “good taste in children’s books“. You can read her well-argued position at the Wall Street Journal. Her arguments are so good that I can’t improve on them, so I’ll simply quote her to give you an idea where she’s at.

Gurdon observes, “How dark is contemporary fiction for teens? Darker than when you were a child, my dear: So dark that kidnapping and pederasty and incest and brutal beatings are now just part of the run of things in novels directed, broadly speaking, at children from the ages of 12 to 18.

Some of her detractors have suggested that reading about such subjects does not lead one to participate in such things, to which she responds, “Reading about homicide doesn’t turn a man into a murderer; reading about cheating on exams won’t make a kid break the honor code. But the calculus that many parents make is less crude than that: It has to do with a child’s happiness, moral development and tenderness of heart. Entertainment does not merely gratify taste, after all, but creates it.

Gurdon also notes that an “argument in favor of such novels is that they validate the teen experience, giving voice to tortured adolescents who would otherwise be voiceless.” Gurdon responds to this by suggesting that “it is also possible—indeed, likely—that books focusing on pathologies help normalize them and, in the case of self-harm, may even spread their plausibility and likelihood to young people who might otherwise never have imagined such extreme measures.

When addressing the literary world’s view of this trend, Gurdon observes, “literary culture is not sympathetic to adults who object either to the words or storylines in young-adult books.” Gurdon goes on to share about an editor who “bemoaned the need, in order to get the book into schools, to strip expletives from Chris Lynch’s 2005 novel, ‘Inexcusable,’ which revolves around a thuggish jock and the rape he commits. ‘I don’t, as a rule, like to do this on young adult books,’ the editor grumbled … I don’t want to acknowledge those f—ing gatekeepers.’ By f—ing gatekeepers (the letter-writing editor spelled it out), she meant those who think it’s appropriate to guide what young people read. In the book trade, this is known as ‘banning.’ In the parenting trade, however, we call this ‘judgment’ or ‘taste.’ It is a dereliction of duty not to make distinctions in every other aspect of a young person’s life between more and less desirable options. Yet let a gatekeeper object to a book and the industry pulls up its petticoats and shrieks ‘censorship!’

In a recent Imprimis article (July/August 2013 issue) adapted from a speech given by Gurdon at Hillsdale College on March 12, 2013, she again shared about those on the secular Left who view her efforts as repressing freedom of expression. This objection is, of course, a hypocritical double-standard. In fact, Gurdon notes in her speech that such secularists “have their own list of books they claim are tinged with racism or jingoism or that depict [GASP!] traditional gender roles.” Gurdon’s larger point is that “the self-proclaimed anti-book-banners on the Left agree that books influence children,” insofar as they demonstrate this by preferring some books to others. This unavoidable elephant in the room is a damning indictment against irresponsible persons who would despoil children’s innocence by promoting an endless stream of material which presents nothing more than (if I can borrow from Dennis Prager) “a proctologist view” of the world.

Rather than continuing, I would invite you to search out Gurdon’s articles on the subject and read through them for yourselves. Allow me to share the ending words of her Hillsdale College speech:

Let me close with Saint Paul the Apostle in Philippians 4:8:

Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable — if anything is excellent or praiseworthy — think about such things.

 And let us think about these words when we go shopping for books for our children.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.



17 thoughts on “Children’s Books – The Good, The Bad & The Ugly. But Mostly The Ugly.

  1. I agree. I recently read an article on common core standards. I can’t locate it now, but it was referring to the 11th grade recommended reading list that includes a book where the reader takes the point of view of a pedophile. This action is not portrayed as wrong or immoral, the author’s intent is for the reader to have compassion for this character. That is doing nothing more than desensitizing a person to an atrocity, and causing a moral conflict in a young person who is not mature enough to handle such a conflict. Can you imagine what it would be like for a child in a class who’s hiding an incestuous relationship being forced to read that book from the point of view their attacker?

    Another thing about these YA fiction books, is that as many adults are reading them as kids. In some cases, its the adults that are putting them on the best seller list, but since they are marketed YA, it looks like the kids are buying them. I didn’t read the “Twilight Series,” but I saw the movies. Sorry, but the storyline was awful. A teen girl who can’t pick between a werewolf and a vampire, her dad’s the sheriff and he can’t figure out he’s got a pack of werewolves or family of vampires living right under his noses–nor the townspeople for that matter. Give me something a little more believable. lol


  2. Thank you for sharing this. I agree, it’s disturbing that so many “young adult” novels are so twisted. Off to read the article now…


  3. Thank you for a well-written post. I also published a post about this on my momsread website. My post included the current links; I hope that Hillsdale College will find a permanent spot to publish Ms. Gurdon’s speech. You may remember the outrage expressed when Ms. Gurdon wrote her first article, “Darkness Too Visible.” I’m happy to find someone else who values her brave words in the face of so much opposition.


  4. Reblogged this on Christ's Reflections and commented:
    Today, I posted an article on my blog entitled, “A Case for Good Taste.” Then, I came across this well-written post, and I had to share it with you. Christian parents MUST monitor the books their children read; the works being produced today by modern authors are often worse than godless.


  5. Wow, great post – I could add so many comments – but whew – will just add one – it is not just teen books that are dark with questionable content – the early elementary grade chapter books need to be monitored too – because innocent looking books (that take hours and months to write and put together with themes and topics that are unGodly) well they can be subtly, yet potently polluting. thanks for this sobering post….

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Reblogged this on A Homeschool Mom and commented:

    Keeping with our literary theme this week… Thanks, again, to my hubby for this incredible article he wrote a few years back.

    We love great literature, but pray the Lord gives each of us wisdom in choosing books which edify and encourage children to strive for righteousness.


  7. Thanks so much for posting this! I spend so much time previewing young adult books for my daughter, and most of them go straight back to the library. I ploughed through some Percy Jackson and the Golden Compass Trilogy a while back – they’re just awful, and no-one says a word! On the contrary, most people seem to think they are getting some sort of spiritual wisdom or guidance from them. That’s even more scary than the books, I think. My daughter and I go to the library and hopefully glance at the young adult section time after time, consistently appalled by the horror and misery of every single title. Even if you are not specifically Christian, there is little to choose from that isn’t morally bleak. We need more good writers for young people who can take advantage of the open eBook publishing industry to get their works known, regardless of what traditional publishers refuse to print!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I love reading children’s/YA and I’m just not finding things worth reading. I wrote a book for my son because he said he was, “sick of touchy-feely books”. The quality, even if the topics weren’t garbage, is horrible. Why would anyone publish them? Unreadable.


  8. It was such a breath of fresh air to attend the Friends of Freddy conference in 2016. These Freddy the Pig books are entertaining for any age young person, funny and good solid values. I hope you all have a chance to read at least one. Freddy the Detective is a good place to start.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.